...and the two-way street [!] ?
A. (Salon)
SPOILER ALERT( Provocative Lede-In Here) It really confounded me when Governor Mike Pence defended the two-way street of tolerance. I don’t think it is really, but now I wonder if “thug” may be of the same confoundation(sic). It may explain things if you read this, one hopes.
B. (Youtube)
Segregated Zone(Only the tolerant are advised to enter. RATED: Undeleted nor bleeped.)
C.D. Fb
E. Contrary Brin
[...]
N F R Y
[Pre-QCON? Wack a mole *ideology* of immoderation? ManyKeyKneeZ'an? Kaufmann/FukuYama? Popper Straussian ?]
* two ends against the Garden or Candide?
(^) comma inserted [tangents, taxes or Texas?]
(and belated addendums @F^uk^u^Yama)
(5-8-15)
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query popper kaufmann. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query popper kaufmann. Sort by date Show all posts
Thursday, May 07, 2015
Sunday, December 01, 2013
Too Random...
...Righty[!]
Knot 2 fraught with fraud'nfreud?
Freedom the foundation or fountainhead?
A stopped clock is right...
too undimention,
1* over infinity has left.
* poetic license in 3 or 4-D.
won over
**
knot exactly; 1/infinity= zorro?
But seriously to unpun one in particular, freedom over everything is the problem.
Freedom over everything equals nothing over physics.
12-2-13 (...)added and *reframed
** s/b standard mobius/infinity (Thought I had previously used one, not this one.)
Embedded links:(Not fully read.)
1. The Difficulty with Hegel
2. Hegel or Anti-Hegel
Fully Read and Reviewing:
The Hegel Myth and its Method: (Kaufmann 1959)Akin to Plato's Form(The Socratics of the Ideal and States)^
Selections:
"The writings of Hegel and Plato abound in admittedly one-sided statements that are clearly meant to formulate points of view that are then shown to be inadequate and are countered by another perspective. Thus an impressive quilt quotation could be patched together to convince gullible readers that Hegel was — depending on the “scholar’s” plans — either emphatically for or utterly opposed to, say, “equality.” But the understanding of Hegel would be advanced ever so much more by citing one of his remarks about equality in context, showing how it is a step in an argument that is designed to lead the reader to a better comprehension of equality and not to enlist his emotions either for it or against it."
"Hegel was rarely cited in the Nazi literature, and, when he was referred to, it was usually by way of disapproval. (...) Rosenberg also stressed, and excoriated, the “Socratic” elements in Plato."
References to 3D/4M@. English***, Math, Form~process.
*** generic word language/numbers as an ideal and a language/so-called results.
I do not necessarily want to break out of my understanding of Hegel, not say he would have understood it my way or anyone else's. But is Popper properly popped? Yet I do use a method of labelism/reference/progression-digression. The hazards of the Internet, not to mention old material, one might not recall running into sources before. I developed my tetrahedron courtesy of my older work on The Republic(1970~), delineating the mass-energy equivalence formula, and possibly Milo Wolff.(2004~)
In the above not yet reads, but glanced at's, they may have a point, and may be missing or pointing from their own point. I may yet to agree or disagree with them, but still appreciate or depreciate their points.
^ & ~ must be reviewed. "Dates~" note time of encounter.
12-3-13 (FP1) Have yet to locate "^". [rtd]
12-4-13 That's the ticket ! ?
But to tilt at swans?
12-9-13 Roughly 13 in rough.
12-10-13 Scientific American Dispute over Infinity Divides Mathematicians
verses RealClearPolitics Newtonian Government
Trinity Squared ?
Knot 2 fraught with fraud'nfreud?
Freedom the foundation or fountainhead?
A stopped clock is right...
too undimention,
1* over infinity has left.
* poetic license in 3 or 4-D.
won over
**knot exactly; 1/infinity= zorro?
But seriously to unpun one in particular, freedom over everything is the problem.
Freedom over everything equals nothing over physics.
12-2-13 (...)added and *reframed
** s/b standard mobius/infinity (Thought I had previously used one, not this one.)
Embedded links:(Not fully read.)
1. The Difficulty with Hegel
2. Hegel or Anti-Hegel
Fully Read and Reviewing:
The Hegel Myth and its Method: (Kaufmann 1959)Akin to Plato's Form(The Socratics of the Ideal and States)^
Selections:
"The writings of Hegel and Plato abound in admittedly one-sided statements that are clearly meant to formulate points of view that are then shown to be inadequate and are countered by another perspective. Thus an impressive quilt quotation could be patched together to convince gullible readers that Hegel was — depending on the “scholar’s” plans — either emphatically for or utterly opposed to, say, “equality.” But the understanding of Hegel would be advanced ever so much more by citing one of his remarks about equality in context, showing how it is a step in an argument that is designed to lead the reader to a better comprehension of equality and not to enlist his emotions either for it or against it."
"Hegel was rarely cited in the Nazi literature, and, when he was referred to, it was usually by way of disapproval. (...) Rosenberg also stressed, and excoriated, the “Socratic” elements in Plato."
References to 3D/4M@. English***, Math, Form~process.
*** generic word language/numbers as an ideal and a language/so-called results.
I do not necessarily want to break out of my understanding of Hegel, not say he would have understood it my way or anyone else's. But is Popper properly popped? Yet I do use a method of labelism/reference/progression-digression. The hazards of the Internet, not to mention old material, one might not recall running into sources before. I developed my tetrahedron courtesy of my older work on The Republic(1970~), delineating the mass-energy equivalence formula, and possibly Milo Wolff.(2004~)
In the above not yet reads, but glanced at's, they may have a point, and may be missing or pointing from their own point. I may yet to agree or disagree with them, but still appreciate or depreciate their points.
^ & ~ must be reviewed. "Dates~" note time of encounter.
12-3-13 (FP1) Have yet to locate "^". [rtd]
12-4-13 That's the ticket ! ?
But to tilt at swans?
12-9-13 Roughly 13 in rough.
12-10-13 Scientific American Dispute over Infinity Divides Mathematicians
verses RealClearPolitics Newtonian Government
Trinity Squared ?
Friday, November 01, 2013
FOOTNOTES PAGE TWO NOVEMBER 2013
11-6-13: "email inspiration" (b.s.)s / A. 2-16-11 Slash
Segue , 6-9-10 Speaking
of jobs..., 2-1-11 Yikes!
3.0 / B. 9-26-11 The
Be All and End All? , 8-31-11 INET
, 6-21-11 Hi
Ate Us , 6-26-13 Post
Newtonian Economics, SoDo
Amalgam, C3PO, (sic), The
Fighting Ill Lie Nigh!, V
for Victim, Righting
the Ship[?], A
Rising Tide, 10-2-11* Retro-Gate, 6-29-11 Caging
Godzillas , 5-18-11 Technical
Difficulties
*format (sc)anachronism (b.s.)=blog searches A & B. dated links reflect scroll click anomaly
mean while ... seg wae
11-21-13 "pun": Knot to Buffet Gates under "more"/"ladder". 1. A. Give 'em a break!, B. Gatekeeper on a High Horse?, C. Remember Pearl Harbor! / 2. A. Thumbs/GOP and OWS , B. Dimentionalism(sic). [Bingo 8 uR baby.]
11-24-13 search anomaly? A. "no such thing as bad press" , B(red labeling)., C. Update , D. Flip-Flop the Pyramid - \/ Understanding "Social Darwinism^ " may not explain blog search results or M-beds, but may be correlary to the mess age: why blog searchs locate posts with their headings hyperlinked to a.) prior link, b.) blog searches, c.) outside links. ^ Kaufmann/Popper/Hegel
*format (sc)anachronism (b.s.)=blog searches A & B. dated links reflect scroll click anomaly
mean while ... seg wae
11-21-13 "pun": Knot to Buffet Gates under "more"/"ladder". 1. A. Give 'em a break!, B. Gatekeeper on a High Horse?, C. Remember Pearl Harbor! / 2. A. Thumbs/GOP and OWS , B. Dimentionalism(sic). [Bingo 8 uR baby.]
11-24-13 search anomaly? A. "no such thing as bad press" , B(red labeling)., C. Update , D. Flip-Flop the Pyramid - \/ Understanding "Social Darwinism
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)